Johnson's Baby Number 5 of 11 in Disposable Breast Pads

Not one of the most widely used breast pads but has a high overall rating.

Positive

  • Good Overall Rating
  • Positive comments about the shape

Negative

"Thicker than some but no issue with that. These are the best shaped pads Ive used. Really good, natural and comfy fit. If they just had another bit of tape they'd stay in place a bit better. No leaking or wet feeling in my experience - could easily do a day and night. Also they aren't individually wrapped which suits me as its really not necessary. Better value than other brands I've tried."
Selected Review

Description

25% more absorbent. Secure comfort and discretion. Special contour shape. Non slip adhesive strip.

More Product Information

RSP £ 4.00

589 Ratings

Overall Rating

179
233
136
30
11
Value for Money 3/5
Quality 3/5
Awareness 1/5
Loyalty 1/5
Popularity 0/5

Most Helpful Reviews

Pad wasn't very sticky which resulted in being moved a few times but wasn't too much of a problem.

10/04/2018
Value for Money 3/5
Quality 4/5

Is this review helpful? (1)

Really soft, don't move about but they are expensive!!

05/09/2016
Value for Money 5/5
Quality 4/5

Is this review helpful? (1)

Reviews (4)

Currently showing all 1 star reviews. Reset

wouldn't recommend. I found them very thin they made me itchy.

27/07/2020
Value for Money 2/5
Quality 2/5

Is this review helpful? (0)

Much too small and did not protect from leaks. Would only be useable after 3/4 months when milk levels out.

23/06/2018
Value for Money 1/5
Quality 1/5

Is this review helpful? (0)

Terrible! Very thick pads that show beneath clothing, are too small in diameter and have a strange protruding shape. Quite expensive for average quality. Also difficult to put in change bag etc as not individually wrapped. Seem absorbent though. Bought them on the recommendation of a friend who loves them as they are more padded than most.

18/12/2016
Value for Money 1/5
Quality 1/5

Is this review helpful? (0)

Awfull! They fell apart as I was using them

17/12/2016
Value for Money /5
Quality 1/5

Is this review helpful? (0)